Skip to content

chore: bump to 1.12.0 — the Python floor reaches consumers - #445

Merged
Polichinel merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
release/v1.12.0
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

chore: bump to 1.12.0 — the Python floor reaches consumers#445
Polichinel merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
release/v1.12.0

Conversation

@Polichinel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Step 1 of the release ritual in publishing_to_pypi.md §C. Bump only — src/ untouched.

MINOR, not patch: the supported environment set grew. requires-python moved >=3.12>=3.11 in #444, and nothing reaches anyone until a release, because PyPI metadata is built from pyproject.toml at release time. Until the tag exists, the 28 views-models requirements files stay blocked on a floor this repository no longer declares.

Same shape as v1.11.0: the wheel is byte-identical apart from metadata.

What this release carries

Since Where it has been sitting
Python floor >=3.11 (#443/#444) today development, no tag
C-331 — heartbeat URL off the curl command line #432 development, no tag, so not on the server
C-343 — the refresh_pipeline.sh header that used to say deploying was one step #431 same

The last two are production shell changes. The box runs v1.11.0 and cannot have them until the redeploy that follows this.

Step 0 — credential review gate: pass

publishing_to_pypi.md §C.0 requires checking ADR-026 §7 before releasing. All four credentials review 2026-11-30; today is 2026-08-13. Nothing overdue, nothing rotated, no date moved — which is the failure that check exists to prevent.

A gate fired, and the fix is not the cheap one

TestF7ProductPlanCurrency failed on the bump: the product plan's title read "current through v1.11".

I did not edit the title green. The plan's convention is an addendum per release — v1.10 and v1.11 both have one — so v1.12 got a real one covering why the floor was never chosen, the permanently forked raster stack, the LZW hole the change exposed rather than caused, and C-347/348/349. The title followed.

Editing only the title would have been this repo's named anti-pattern: the cheapest path to green rather than the honest one.

Verification

pytest exit 0 · ruff clean · mypy src/ clean · uv lock --check clean · validate_docs.sh PASSED.

Next

Promotion developmentmain as a merge commit (a squash rewrites release SHAs), then tag, GitHub Release, and the back-merge. #442 was closed in favour of that promotion — its body had drifted from its contents.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

MINOR, not patch: the supported environment set GREW. requires-python
moved >=3.12 -> >=3.11 in #444, and nothing reaches anyone until a
release, because PyPI metadata is built from pyproject at release time.
Until this tag exists the 28 views-models requirements files stay
blocked on a floor this repository no longer declares.

src/ is untouched — the wheel is byte-identical to v1.11.0 apart from
metadata, same as v1.11.0 was to v1.10.0.

Also carried by this release, both sitting in development since #431/#432
and in no tag, therefore not on the server: C-331 (the heartbeat URL off
the curl command line) and C-343 (the refresh_pipeline.sh header that
used to say deploying was one step).

The product plan gained a v1.12 addendum rather than a retitled header.
TestF7ProductPlanCurrency fired on the bump because the title read
"current through v1.11", and editing just the title would have been the
cheapest green path rather than the honest one — the plan's own
convention is an addendum per release. It records why the floor was never
chosen, the permanently forked raster stack, the LZW hole the change
exposed rather than caused, and C-347/348/349.

pytest exit 0, ruff clean, mypy clean, uv lock --check clean,
validate_docs PASSED.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Polichinel
Polichinel enabled auto-merge (squash) August 13, 2026 07:07
@Polichinel
Polichinel merged commit e44a3b4 into development Aug 13, 2026
6 checks passed
@Polichinel
Polichinel deleted the release/v1.12.0 branch August 13, 2026 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant