Completed Array-2 Assignment

[Hriday-A]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Disappeared Numbers (find_disappered_numbers.java)

Remember, the student's solution is in Java, while the reference is in C++. Focus on the algorithm and logic, not language-specific differences.

Let's begin.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

---

max and min (min_max.java)

Your solution is excellent and matches the optimal algorithm for this problem. You have correctly implemented the pairwise comparison method, which minimizes the number of comparisons. The code is clean, efficient, and easy to understand. You have handled the edge cases (even and odd length arrays) appropriately. There are no improvements needed in terms of correctness, efficiency, or code quality. Keep up the good work!

VERDICT: PASS

---

Life Game (game_of_life.java)

Your solution correctly implements the Game of Life problem with the required in-place update. The use of temporary states (2 and 3) is efficient and avoids the need for extra space. The code is mostly clean and easy to follow. However, there are a few areas for improvement:

1. Indentation and Formatting: The code has inconsistent indentation, especially in the second pass where the inner loop's closing brace is misaligned. Proper indentation improves readability.
2. Redundant Condition Check: In the second pass, you have two separate if statements for converting 2 to 0 and 3 to 1. This is acceptable, but you could use else if for clarity, though it's not necessary.
3. Initialization: The dirs array is initialized correctly, but note that it could be declared as static final if it were constant, though in this context it's fine as is.
4. Edge Cases: Your solution handles boundaries correctly by checking r>=0 && c>=0 && r<m && c<n.

Overall, your solution is efficient and correct. With minor formatting adjustments, it would be perfect.

VERDICT: PASS