Skip to content

Support for bulk operations - #149

Merged
azmeuk merged 16 commits into
python-scim:mainfrom
frohrlich:bulk-operations
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

azmeuk merged 16 commits into
python-scim:mainfrom
frohrlich:bulk-operations

Conversation

@frohrlich

@frohrlich frohrlich commented Aug 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py Outdated
Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py
Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py
@azmeuk

This comment was marked as resolved.

Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py Outdated
Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py Outdated
Comment thread tests/test_bulk.py Outdated
@frohrlich
frohrlich force-pushed the bulk-operations branch 2 times, most recently from 8e54571 to 53a5a80 Compare September 9, 2026 08:55
Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py
Comment thread doc/tutorial.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/tutorial.rst Outdated
Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py Outdated
Comment thread scim2_models/messages/bulk.py Outdated
…sses, which allows for correct attribute typing
The context table of the validate-and-serialize guide promised the context each HTTP operation calls for, and listed every one but POST /Bulk. BulkOperation was autoclassed without a class docstring, so the model an application handles the most showed no description in the API reference, and nothing warned that BulkOperation[User | Group] annotates a field rather than naming a model class.
@azmeuk
azmeuk merged commit b51760d into python-scim:main Sep 15, 2026
21 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

2 participants