Skip to content

Increase result font size, harmonize bold usage, implement conditional features list bold styling #7741

Merged
nirvn merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
result_font_harmony
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

Increase result font size, harmonize bold usage, implement conditional features list bold styling #7741
nirvn merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
result_font_harmony

Conversation

@nirvn

@nirvn nirvn commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR cleans up the use of the resultFont style by:

  • slightly increasing the font size (larger, easier to read, an important UX with results list :) )
  • insuring that all lists use the result font (i.e. relation editor widgets)
  • insuring that all lists' result items have non-bold font weight (significant win for the features list)
  • insuring that all lists' section header use the brand new strongResultFont

This is how the features list look now (i.e. your eyes are not drowning in bold fonts ;) ):

Screenshot From 2026-07-12 13-57-04

In turn, this allows us to implement conditional bold styling of features list items, something that couldn't be done when we added conditional styling in QField 4.2 since the items were always bold.

Conditional bold styling in action:

Screenshot From 2026-07-12 14-11-20

@qfield-fairy

qfield-fairy commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🍎 MacOS DMG universal builds

Download a MacOS DMG universal build of this PR for testing.
(Built from commit 49f3305)

📱 Android builds

Download an Android arm64 build of this PR for testing.
(Built from commit 49f3305)

Other Android architectures

🪟 Windows builds

Download a Windows build of this PR for testing and for arm64.

(Built from commit 49f3305)

🐧 Linux AppImage builds

Download a Linux AppImage build of this PR for testing.
(Built from commit 49f3305)

@nirvn nirvn merged commit a81dd37 into master Jul 13, 2026
29 checks passed
@nirvn nirvn deleted the result_font_harmony branch July 13, 2026 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants