Skip to content

Recover and compare bounded ARM64 state transitions - #5

Merged
nazeeh111 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/bounded-state
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

nazeeh111 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/bounded-state

Conversation

@nazeeh111

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

An edited function can return the right value while silently losing a state update. Rewynth now recovers and compares the return plus every word of an explicitly declared, bounded state buffer. The workbench and CLI support editable transition JSON, complete counterexamples, exact 64-bit tracing, workspace restoration and portable pure-transition C export.

The included lesson uses the unchanged PCG32 routine from pinned, attributed upstream source. A deleted-store control keeps its immediate return but fails the joint state comparison. Scope is one pointer to 1–3 fixed 64-bit words with at most four logical inputs; unsupported addressing and stateful inversion refuse explicitly.

Validation: a frozen local gate matched 37 states across 74 native calls; 28 new checks and 91 distinct data regressions passed; independent review exercised 16 product checks and 30 states across five generated C exports. Actual desktop/mobile workflows and an isolated installed-wheel lesson passed. Wheel and sdist contents match the frozen source. These checks establish the documented bounded model and finite examples, not general binary equivalence or an upstream PCG bug.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T08:38:00.886598Z 8733383 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@nazeeh111
nazeeh111 merged commit 0042974 into main Oct 16, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant