Skip to content

retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence #164

Closed

Description

@mochan-tk

Objective

Promote candidate #125 into one minimal, human-reviewed retro PR that prevents existing green checks from being accepted as evidence of a newly requested implementation delta, then retire the candidate after merge.

Context & references

Acceptance criteria

  • AC1: The Plan and PR classify the observed root cause using the retro skill table, cite all three occurrence links, and explain why the chosen owned asset is the most deterministic feasible host. Prefer an executable check/test over advisory prose where it can actually measure the claim; do not pretend a SHA change, test count, text match, task_complete signal, or generic suite pass measures the requested behavior.
  • AC2: Deliver the smallest asset diff that would have prevented acceptance of the latest occurrence. It must distinguish baseline verification from the latest requested source/test change, bind evidence to that request and actual delta, and require the applicable new regression, ordered test/fix commits and captured red-then-fixed evidence before implementation completion. Do not invent historical red results or turn this into an unconditional requirement for artificial source/test edits on documentation-only work. Preserve credited evidence and the rule that upper tiers inspect evidence rather than rebuild it.
  • AC3: Before the asset change, define and record the focused negative and positive cases. Reject (a) unchanged baseline-green evidence for a new correction, (b) a changed SHA without the requested behavior/delta, and (c) word counts substituted for state comparisons. Accept real request-specific delta and ordered red/fixed evidence; keep legitimate documentation-only verification possible. If changing executable logic, add focused regressions first and record their genuine red before the fix and green after it, then run affected existing suites. If the classified fix is procedural only, provide a before/after scenario walkthrough tied to exact text and explain the deterministic limit; do not claim runtime enforcement or observed future compliance.
  • AC4: Use only the necessary subset of the candidate assets in File ownership. Keep the Task form and body template synchronized if either changes. For every line added to AGENTS.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md remove or demote a line in that file, report before/after counts and the trade, and preserve all surface ceilings. No unrelated budget trimming is requested.
  • AC5: Append exactly one row to .github/docs/agreements/retro-log.md, preserving every existing row. Use the retro skill's four-cell format | YYYY-MM-DD | Failure class | Fix (asset + change) | Evidence |; use the actual date and selected asset, and cite both retro-candidate: Passing baseline tests mistaken for new-feature completion #125 and Retro hygiene review 2026-09 #118 in Evidence. Obtain at least one human approval for this agreements-tree change per docs.instructions.md and the retro Procedure before merge. A custom reviewer audit is not human approval.
  • AC6: Publish exactly one PR titled retro: <what it prevents> with the full PR template, Plan link, all acceptance evidence, explicit deviations and required custom-reviewer audit. Because AC7 is post-merge, its primary Task link uses Refs followed by this Task's issue reference; do not use an automatic closing reference for this Task or retro-candidate: Passing baseline tests mistaken for new-feature completion #125 and do not batch the candidate as a second Task.
  • AC7 (post-merge, supervisor/coordinator): Verify the PR is merged, append a fix-link comment to retro-candidate: Passing baseline tests mistaken for new-feature completion #125 explaining that the landed retro PR retires this failure class, and manually mark the candidate completed. Then record this Task's post-merge evidence and Outcome before manually marking this Task completed. Until these actions are verified, AC7 stays pending and no completed Task outcome is valid. Filing this Task or opening its PR does not retire retro-candidate: Passing baseline tests mistaken for new-feature completion #125.

Out of scope

  • Reimplementing Support single-maintainer governance with mandatory CI and no required peer approval #124, reopening its historical exceptions, reconstructing lost evidence, or changing its closed ledger.
  • Platform-baseline changes, other retro candidates, a new runtime completion hook, authenticated identity assertions, telemetry, or additional approval stages beyond existing risk and human-merge gates.
  • Workflow files, workflow permissions/triggers, live rulesets/variables, required-check names, auto-merge, or bypasses. Never weaken existing checks. If the selected fix needs an unowned path or workflow change, stop and request replan before editing it.
  • Substantive REQ/ADR changes, unrelated agreement riders, broad refactoring, and implementation of the parallel platform-review Task.

File ownership

  • .github/skills/verification/SKILL.md
  • .github/skills/session-orchestration/SKILL.md
  • .github/skills/session-orchestration/references/ritual-records.md
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ai-task.yml
  • .github/skills/plan-management/templates/task-body.md
  • .github/scripts/check-task-ritual.sh
  • .github/scripts/task-ritual-lib.sh
  • .github/scripts/tests/test-task-ritual.sh
  • .github/scripts/tests/test-ritual-*.sh
  • .github/docs/agreements/retro-log.md
  • AGENTS.md
  • .github/copilot-instructions.md

Verification

Run these mandatory repository checks and record actual results; all must exit 0:

bash .github/scripts/check-copilot-surface.sh
bash .github/scripts/check-template-sync.sh
bash .github/scripts/tests/run-tests.sh ritual escalation-wording ownership-overlap retro-hygiene tuning-status
 git diff --check
wc -l AGENTS.md .github/copilot-instructions.md
 git status --short

The selected suites cover the allowed ritual guard/library and their existing chronology/linkage/dispatch/adoption/record tests, ownership grammar, escalation wording, hygiene and tuning behavior. Run any additional existing suite that consumes a touched asset; for guard/library changes also run bash .github/scripts/tests/run-tests.sh retarget-freshness ci-event-isolation. Keep Bash 3.2 compatibility for changed shell logic. Record focused AC3 commands/results and exact-head diff/commit evidence in the PR; existing green suites alone do not establish AC2 or AC3.

Inspect the PR diff and git log --reverse --format='%H %cI %s' <base>..HEAD against the approved Plan, selected paths, test/fix order, one-row log addition and budget trade. After publication, substitute the actual numbers into gh pr view <pr> --json body,files,headRefOid,reviews,state,mergedAt, gh pr checks <pr>, and gh issue view <this-task> --comments. For AC7, read gh issue view 125 --json state,comments after the manual disposition and link its fix comment in the Task outcome. Do not manufacture evidence or mark pending human/post-merge criteria passed.

Routing

  • Surface: exec:app
  • Suggested role: default
  • Model/reasoning tier: high-reasoning; repository implementation setting is auto. Respect the explicit Epic Epic: Reduce development friction without weakening verification #119 owner preference for new sessions (gpt-6-astra) when dispatching, with explicit model and mode arguments; do not silently substitute a default.
  • Parallel-safe: yes with the platform-baseline review; this Task owns the retro log and bounded completion-evidence assets, never platform-capability-baseline.tsv. No blocked-by edge is needed for these disjoint sets; recheck other active ownership before dispatch.
  • Risk/review: risk:high applies because asset selection may change a completion operating contract, the constitution or a CI guard, not merely editorial wording. The supervisor posts the Plan and waits for the existing explicit approval before worker implementation. Exactly one custom reviewer session is mandatory for this governance-surface Task, regardless of final asset choice.

Handoff notes

Use one default-agent supervisor, one default-agent worker in autopilot, and one custom reviewer session; no supervisor-direct exemption. The supervisor owns Task ritual comments and post-merge disposition; the worker owns the PR and evidence. Create and verify the worker before publishing its dispatch, then release it under the approved Plan. Use supported, exposed Rubber Duck in-loop; if unavailable, record that once in the existing Plan or PR evidence and continue the other review duties without inventing a replacement gate. Decomposition and ai:ready certify a complete brief, not dispatch or merge permission. The coordinator owns #118 disposition; do not change that issue. Preserve the English, plain-ASCII durable-artifact convention and avoid closing-keyword/issue-number phrases in issue comments.

Activity

  1. added
    type:taskSelf-contained work order for one agent session
    ai:readyBrief meets the planner quality bar; dispatchable when unblocked
    exec:appRoute: Copilot app session — steerable, worktree-isolated
    risk:highException gate: pause after the plan comment until approved (default is pass-through)
    on Sep 20, 2026
  2. mochan-tk commented on Sep 20, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Starting in session Task #164 supervisor, branch task/164-retro-completion-evidence

    Task: #164

  3. mochan-tk commented on Sep 20, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Plan

    Task: #164

    Goal and acceptance: deliver one minimal retro for #125 under #164, not a repair of #124. AC1 classifies all three occurrences and justifies the host; AC2 binds completion evidence to the latest requested delta; AC3 exercises the negative/positive scenarios below; AC4 limits paths and preserves budgets; AC5 appends one retro-log row with human approval before merge; AC6 publishes one fully evidenced draft PR and one independent audit; AC7 remains pending until coordinator-authorized post-merge disposition.

    Classification and selected assets:

    Implementation procedure after explicit approval:

    1. Worker records the pre-change scenario inputs and existing exact text/line references before editing the skill. Baseline is supervisor HEAD 446071c; worker must record its actual base/head rather than assume it stayed identical.
    2. Require the latest request/Plan/correction link, the pre-correction base/head, and the actual relevant source/test diff to be identified before treating any suite as completion evidence. Rework must bind fresh evidence to that correction while preserving separately credited earlier evidence.
    3. For executable behavior changes, require the applicable new focused regression, genuine captured failure before the production fix, ordered test/fix commits, and captured fixed success bound to the actual tested revision/diff. Keep commands, scalar exits, relevant assertions, and actual comparison results distinct. Where state comparison is claimed, compare named states/paths directly; counts or absent comparisons are not a measurement. Missing historical evidence stays missing; do not fabricate a red by rerunning fixed code.
    4. Explicitly distinguish documentation-only work: prove the requested document delta and relevant documentation checks/walkthrough without artificial source/test edits or invented red runs. Preserve upper-tier record inspection, not suite rebuilding.
    5. Publish one draft PR titled 'retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for implementation evidence', primary link 'Refs retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence #164', complete existing PR template, Plan link, AC1-AC7 table, explicit Deviations, scenario walkthrough and exact-head evidence. No automatic closing reference for the Task or candidate. AC5 human approval and AC7 post-merge actions remain honestly pending.

    AC3 cases defined BEFORE asset changes (procedural before/after walkthrough, not runtime tests):

    Case Input and old-text gap to examine Required post-change decision/evidence
    N1 unchanged baseline New correction link, unchanged head/source/tests, only old green suites. Existing generic test-first/checklist wording does not explicitly rebind a continuation to its new request. Reject implementation completion; identify absent requested regression/source delta and fresh capture. Preserve baseline passes only as baseline.
    N2 unrelated new SHA New commit or edited unrelated file plus generic green suites, but no requested behavior/test delta. Existing checklist checks scope and tests generally, not request-to-delta correspondence. Reject; SHA movement, test count, text matches and task_complete are not requested behavior proof. Inspect actual relevant diff and assertions.
    N3 surrogate comparison Word counts labeled state guards, or capture with no before/after comparison. Existing 'real output' requirement does not specify what claimed state measurements must compare. Reject only the unsupported comparison; require actual named-state/path comparisons and their results. Retain corroborated real reds, hashes and test-before-fix order.
    P1 real correction Latest request linked to relevant source/test diff, focused new regression fails for the requested behavior before fix, ordered test/fix commits, fixed pass and real comparisons captured at identified states. Accept this implementation-evidence component; other AC, CI and review conditions still apply.
    P2 documentation only Requested wording delta, exact diff and scenario/appropriate documentation checks, no executable logic changed. Accept the applicable documentation evidence without artificial code/tests/reds; human and post-merge conditions remain separate.
    The worker's PR must quote exact before/after text and line references for each decision. These are scenario evaluations of a procedural contract; neither future agent compliance nor runtime rejection has been observed. Existing general rules are not claimed to have authorized the historical bad completions. No executable logic change is planned; any proposed move into guard/library behavior requires a Plan revision and approval before edits, with focused regressions and genuine red before fix, then green and affected existing suites.

    Ownership, budgets and exclusions:

    • Two selected paths only; no Task/PR template, ritual reference, guard/test, AGENTS.md, copilot-instructions.md or session-orchestration edit is planned. No new REQ/ADR or unrelated agreement rider.
    • Fresh counts: AGENTS.md 117; copilot-instructions.md 125; verification skill 137; session-orchestration skill 500. Record before/after counts; unchanged always-on files have zero added/removed lines, so no trade is needed. If either always-on file must change, stop for revised asset approval: every line added must remove/demote a line in that same file and the PR must name the trade. Preserve all surface ceilings; do not trim unrelated content.
    • Exclude Support single-maintainer governance with mandatory CI and no required peer approval #124 implementation/history/exceptions, other candidates/Tasks, platform baseline, runtime hooks/identity/telemetry, extra approval stages, workflow/ruleset/variable/required-check changes, weakening checks and broad refactoring.
    • Current ownership observation: ownership-overlap.sh for 164 and 163 returned NO_OVERLAP; other open Task Ritual wall threat model: unauthenticated comments and no CI re-run on comment events #6 and PR Consume persisted governance intent in governance status #104 are outside this work. Recheck active ownership before worker dispatch.

    Verification assigned to the worker (capture actual results; baseline checks do not establish AC2/AC3):

    • bash .github/scripts/check-copilot-surface.sh -> exit 0, frontmatter/English/surface ceilings pass.
    • bash .github/scripts/check-template-sync.sh -> exit 0, unchanged paired templates stay synchronized.
    • bash .github/scripts/tests/run-tests.sh ritual escalation-wording ownership-overlap retro-hygiene tuning-status -> exit 0, all selected suites pass.
    • git diff --check -> exit 0, no whitespace errors.
    • wc -l AGENTS.md .github/copilot-instructions.md -> exit 0, 117 and 125 expected unchanged; also count the modified skill and other capped surfaces.
    • git status --short -> exit 0 and empty after commits; keep session cache uncommitted.
    • Inspect exact base..HEAD diff and git log --reverse --format='%H %cI %s' ..HEAD -> exit 0; precisely two owned paths, one appended retro row, no deleted old rows, actual procedural-only sequence, no fabricated test/fix commits.
    • Run any additional existing suite consuming a touched asset. Guard/library changes are not authorized by this Plan; a revised approved Plan would also require bash .github/scripts/tests/run-tests.sh retarget-freshness ci-event-isolation and Bash 3.2 evidence.
    • After publication: gh pr view --json body,files,headRefOid,reviews,state,mergedAt ; gh pr checks ; gh issue view 164 --comments -> inspect actual matching-head draft/CI/ledger state, not a proxy. Worker maintains PR evidence; supervisor verifies the record and ownership, never rebuilds it without a specified contradiction.

    Authority and handoff:

    • Startup check exited 1 (untuned). Scoped deferral Epic: Reduce development friction without weakening verification #119 (comment) applies to approved Epic: Reduce development friction without weakening verification #119 work; preserve CUSTOMIZE and do not onboard. It is not this Plan's risk approval. Dispatch authority is Epic: Reduce development friction without weakening verification #119 (comment) .
    • Task retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence #164 supervisor owns claim/Plan/dispatch/review-checkpoint/Outcome; no supervisor-direct exemption. After approval, create exactly one default-agent worker with explicit gpt-6-astra/autopilot, coordination enabled and always idle notification, no base_branch; hold implementation until get_session confirmation, refreshed dispatch preflight and the recorded dispatch release. Use the complete Worker kickoff with verbatim Task ownership/verification and the narrower approved two-path selection.
    • After the worker's draft PR, post Review checkpoint and create exactly one custom reviewer session with explicit gpt-6-astra/autopilot, coordination disabled and no base_branch. Its durable handoff is a non-approving PR audit. Rubber Duck is not exposed in this supervisor session's available tools; no run is claimed, and no replacement approval gate is added.
    • Human approval is required before merge for the retro-log agreements-tree change; the audit is not that approval. Coordinator retains owner GO, ready/merge authority and all label/governance changes. Supervisor records a blocked/pending Outcome before reporting while human or AC7 obligations remain. Do not mark the PR ready, approve, merge, edit old comments/Task body, or change other Tasks.
    • AC7 only after coordinator confirms merge and instructs: verify mergedAt, append the fix-link explanation to retro-candidate: Passing baseline tests mistaken for new-feature completion #125, perform authorized manual candidate disposition, verify gh issue view 125 --json state,comments, then record Task post-merge evidence/Outcome before authorized manual Task disposition. Until then, no completed Task outcome.

    STOP: Task #164 supervisor will create no worker and perform no file edit, commit, branch push or PR creation until the coordinator posts a comment starting '## Approval (risk:high Plan gate)' on #164 explicitly approving this Plan.

  4. liner-takashi-kawamoto commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @liner-takashi-kawamoto

    Approval (risk:high Plan gate) - coordinator, Epic #119

    Approved Plan of record: #164 (comment) (posted 2026-09-20T00:22:10Z, unedited at approval time: REST created_at = updated_at), following claim 5746366221 (00:20:28Z) by the supervisor session "Task #164 supervisor" (project session and tool-visible ID 7d8f4746-5a3d-455a-adec-80dc44337b64), actual branch mochan-tk-task-164-supervisor (app-renamed from mochan-tk-fluffy-system), clean at origin/main = 446071c76f14f5fbda37a0eef1b6eafa0a3ab897. The supervisor stopped after the Plan as the Routing block requires. Coordinator re-read on 2026-09-28 at approx. 17:45Z, immediately before this comment: the Task body has never been edited (GraphQL userContentEdits totalCount 0; raw body md5 f7789320f6e15630b8617c50a1fee2c0, the value recorded before dispatch); this issue still holds exactly the claim and the Plan; origin/main has not moved since the Plan; no remote branch matches this Task; the only open PRs are #166 (.github/scripts/platform-capability-baseline.tsv only) and #104 (governance-status.sh and its test); the supervisor worktree is clean with no plan.md; ownership-overlap.sh for 164 and 163 returns NO_OVERLAP; line counts on origin/main are AGENTS.md 117, .github/copilot-instructions.md 125, verification skill 137 and session-orchestration skill 500. No worker exists and no file has changed.

    Authority. The owner, asked in the Epic #119 coordinator session after the coordinator compared the Plan against the work order (Objective, Context, AC1-AC7, Out of scope, File ownership, Verification, Routing, Handoff notes) and recorded that comparison in Epic #119 comment 5746403075, approved this Plan with the one condition below. The first request (2026-09-20 approx. 00:27Z) returned a tool error without an answer; the owner's explicit answer, selecting approval with the stated condition, arrived on 2026-09-29 JST (2026-09-28 approx. 17:42Z), and the coordinator re-verified the facts above before posting. Dispatch decision and terms: Epic #119 comment 5746350040; creation record 5746372458; M1 verification 5746403075; planner rationale 5746293307; #118 review record 5746263031; onboarding deferral in scope: 5668795167 (startup exit 1 acknowledged as untuned, nothing more; the deferral is not risk approval). This comment is the single risk-gate approval for #164. It does not approve the PR, ready-for-review conversion or merge, and it is not the AC5 human approval of the agreements change: both are a separate owner decision on the PR after record verification and the reviewer audit, recorded by the coordinator on the PR (precedent: PR #158 comment 5742874119). It presents no earlier approval as a new one.

    Condition. The PR title must mirror the Task title exactly: retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence. The draft title in Plan step 5 omits the word requested; this condition corrects that string only and changes no scope, ownership or acceptance criterion.

    Permitted scope. The Plan's two-path subset of the Task's File ownership, and nothing else: .github/skills/verification/SKILL.md (a compact request-specific completion procedure placed in the existing Test-first work orders / Pre-PR checklist flow, not duplicated in other assets) and .github/docs/agreements/retro-log.md (exactly one appended four-cell row | YYYY-MM-DD | Failure class | Fix (asset + change) | Evidence | with the actual execution date, the selected asset, and both #125 and #118 in Evidence; every existing row preserved byte-for-byte). The procedure binds implementation-completion evidence to the latest request/Plan/correction link, the pre-correction base/head and the actual relevant source/test delta; for executable behavior changes it requires the applicable new focused regression, a genuine captured failure before the production fix, ordered test/fix commits and captured fixed success at the identified revision; claimed state measurements compare named states or paths directly; missing historical evidence stays missing; documentation-only work proves its requested document delta without artificial source/test edits or invented red runs; separately credited earlier evidence and upper-tier inspection (not rebuilding) are preserved. The other eleven owned paths (session-orchestration skill and its ritual reference, PR template, Task form and body template, ritual guard, library and tests, AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md) stay byte-for-byte unchanged; AGENTS.md and .github/copilot-instructions.md keep 117 and 125 lines; the verification skill's before/after counts are recorded and every surface ceiling holds. No executable logic change, no new REQ or ADR, no agreements wording rider, no new dependency or service.

    Execution authority. One worker session (default agent, explicit gpt-6-astra, explicit autopilot, coordinate_with_creator: true, notify_on_idle: always, no base_branch) created by the supervisor in the order create -> confirm actual identity/branch/worktree with get_session -> task-ritual.sh render/inspect/preflight -> Dispatching worker record on this issue -> explicit release, using the complete Worker kickoff template with the Task's verbatim File ownership and Verification plus the narrower approved two-path selection; the worker's startup hold may include renaming its branch to task-164-retro-completion-evidence (managed prefix accepted) before any edit, and its first commit must postdate the dispatch record. Supervisor-direct implementation is not eligible for this Task. The worker executes Plan steps 1-5: it records the pre-change inputs and the exact existing text/line references of each AC3 case (N1 unchanged baseline, N2 unrelated new SHA, N3 surrogate comparison, P1 real correction, P2 documentation only) before editing, then quotes the exact before/after text and line references for every case decision in the PR as a procedural walkthrough with the deterministic limit stated; it runs every Verification command of the Task (check-copilot-surface.sh, check-template-sync.sh, run-tests.sh ritual escalation-wording ownership-overlap retro-hygiene tuning-status, git diff --check, wc -l, git status --short, the base..HEAD diff and commit log) and records its actual base SHA and outputs; commits with the Copilot App trailer; and opens the PR as a DRAFT through the app tool with the exact title above, the full PR template, the primary link Refs to this Task, no closing keyword for this Task, #125 or any other issue anywhere (PR text, commits, evidence, comments), links to the Plan and this Approval, one evidence row per AC1-AC7 with AC5 human approval and AC7 honestly pending, and explicit Deviations. The worker never posts ritual comments on this issue. Within this scope, edit -> verify -> record needs no further approval. Re-approval is required for any material change to ownership (including touching any unselected owned path or any always-on file), scope, authority or acceptance criteria, including any move of the rule into guard or library behavior: post a revised ## Plan (never edit this comment or the original Plan) and stop again. If the Plan cannot be satisfied as specified, escalate per AGENTS.md section 6 with a comment on this issue stating the situation and the options, then stop and report; the coordinator applies the matching needs:replan or needs:human label (label changes stay with the coordinator per decision 5746350040).

    Risk. risk:high because the change amends the verification procedure every agent follows and appends to the agreements tree. Accepted on these conditions: the diff is procedural only and claims neither runtime enforcement nor observed future compliance; no test, check or lint is deleted, skipped or weakened, and no guard, library, test, workflow, ruleset, variable or required check changes; the always-on files are untouched; documentation-only verification stays possible; after a ## Review checkpoint on this issue, the mandatory independent custom reviewer audit (exactly one session, agent reviewer, explicit gpt-6-astra, explicit autopilot, coordinate_with_creator: false, no base_branch) is published as a non-approving comment on the PR while it is still a draft, checking Task linkage, every AC evidence row, verification integrity, the two-path ownership, the Budget rule, deviations and governance safety; Rubber Duck is claimed only where actually run (the supervisor stated its absence once in the Plan); ## Outcome is posted before any session message and is expected to be blocked on the AC5 human approval, human merge authority and the AC7 post-merge steps, never completed before AC7 is verified; human merge authority is unchanged.

    Post-merge (AC7). Only after the coordinator confirms the merge and sends an explicit instruction: verify mergedAt; append the fix-link comment to #125 explaining that the landed retro PR retires this failure class; manually mark #125 completed; verify with gh issue view 125 --json state,stateReason,comments; record this Task's post-merge evidence and Outcome; then manually mark this Task completed. This Approval authorizes those steps only when that instruction arrives; it does not release them now.

    Not authorized here. Merge, ready-for-review conversion, --admin, auto-merge, branch deletion, gh pr review --approve, live ruleset/variable/branch-protection changes, required-check or workflow changes, label changes, edits or deletions of existing ledger comments or the Task body, editing the Epic #119 body, any action on #125 before the post-merge instruction, any implementation of or exception for the #124 history, and any action on #163, #165, PR #166, #6, #155, PR #104, #148, #150-#153 or #162.

  5. liner-takashi-kawamoto commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @liner-takashi-kawamoto

    Dispatching worker: Task #164 worker (session 152eb473-d330-4964-a56d-b5c25064e0f7), branch liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence

    Task: #164

    Target: one forthcoming DRAFT PR titled exactly 'retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence', primary Task link 'Refs #164'.
    Scope: ONLY .github/skills/verification/SKILL.md and .github/docs/agreements/retro-log.md, procedural change plus exactly one appended four-cell row; all other paths unchanged.
    Plan: #164 (comment)
    Approval: #164 (comment)

    Created this default-agent worker with explicit gpt-6-astra/autopilot, coordinate_with_creator true, notify_on_idle always, no base_branch. get_session confirmed the actual tool-visible ID above, renamed branch and isolated worktree liner-takashi-kawamoto-reimagined-memory before this record; the worker separately reported app workspace ID e6a7128f-0bd7-4f1a-9ebf-833121d3eca3. Its startup hold reports clean HEAD/base 446071c and no file edits/commits/push/PR. Supervisor refreshed origin/main at that same SHA, ledger has the unedited claim/Plan/Approval, budgets remain 117/125/137/500 and ownership-overlap 164 163 is NO_OVERLAP. Full kickoff includes verbatim ownership/Verification, the narrower approved scope, five pre-change AC3 cases, conditioned title, evidence/human/post-merge limits. An explicit release message will follow publication/readback; first edit and commit must follow this dispatch.

    Current-session tool observation corrects the earlier Plan availability statement: the resumed supervisor exposes a Rubber Duck task tool and has now run one read-only in-loop Plan critique. It is advisory, not approval or the independent Task audit. Useful cautions: tie relevant delta to the particular correction, separate implementer capture from upper-tier inspection, use direct state comparisons, keep documentation-only exemption adjacent and scope mixed work by executable portions. Its suggested universal rule that any check already passing on the base disqualifies evidence is NOT adopted: baseline checks remain credited as baseline; request-specific assertions and actual delta, not an unconditional rerun or new scope, determine completion. No approved scope or acceptance change follows.

    No ready/merge/approve/label/governance action; AC5 human approval and AC7 remain pending. No action on candidate #125 before the coordinator's explicit post-merge instruction. Task #164 supervisor retains ritual, checkpoint and Outcome duties; worker owns its PR evidence and reports only to the supervisor.

  6. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Owner-account confirmation of records 5875471874 and 5875535432 - coordinator, Epic #119

    Posted from the owner account mochan-tk (author_association OWNER) at the owner's direction, given in the Epic #119 coordinator session on 2026-09-28 (UTC) after the coordinator reported the identity change below. This comment adds attribution only: it approves nothing new, changes no scope, and edits no existing comment.

    Two ledger comments on this issue were published under the Copilot app's linked account liner-takashi-kawamoto (author_association NONE, pull-only on this repository). The session environments now receive that account's token as GH_TOKEN (observed on 2026-09-28; every earlier comment on this issue, including the claim and the Plan, was made as mochan-tk, which is still logged in through the keyring). Neither writer noticed before posting:

    Comment Record Written by Coordinator verification
    5875471874 (17:48:47Z) ## Approval (risk:high Plan gate) Epic #119 coordinator session bc37a138-f374-4c18-a078-f0e9d7a19de7 posted after the owner's explicit in-session confirmation; read back identical; unedited (created_at = updated_at)
    5875535432 (17:53:02Z) Dispatching worker Task #164 supervisor session 7d8f4746-5a3d-455a-adec-80dc44337b64 names worker 152eb473-d330-4964-a56d-b5c25064e0f7 (get_session: name "Task #164 worker", created 17:50:42Z, branch liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence, worktree liner-takashi-kawamoto-reimagined-memory, zero diff), the exact conditioned PR title, the two approved paths, and links to the Plan and the Approval; unedited (created_at = updated_at)

    The owner confirms both as genuine records of this Task's ledger, with the same force as if mochan-tk had posted them; 5875471874 remains the single risk-gate approval for this Task. The liner-takashi-kawamoto- prefix in the worker's branch is the app's managed prefix and is accepted as the managed-prefix equivalent under AGENTS.md section 4.

    The owner also decided that from now on every gh and git operation of the coordinator, the supervisor and the worker runs as mochan-tk with GH_TOKEN unset (keyring credentials), each session first verifying that env -u GH_TOKEN gh api user --jq .login returns mochan-tk, and that app tools which would write to GitHub under the linked account are not used for this Task. The PR is therefore pushed and opened with env -u GH_TOKEN git push and env -u GH_TOKEN gh pr create --draft under mochan-tk; the PR records this as a deviation from the app-tool default.

    State at this confirmation: the worker's release had been delivered, then the coordinator put the supervisor and the worker on hold at approx. 17:53Z. The worker reports HEAD 446071c76f14f5fbda37a0eef1b6eafa0a3ab897, an empty git status --short, and no commit, push, PR or GitHub write. No remote branch or PR exists for this Task. The coordinator resumes both sessions after this comment is read back.

  7. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Publication route blocker - Task #164 supervisor

    Owner-account confirmation #164 (comment) was read in full and verified as mochan-tk / OWNER, unedited. The supervisor verified the requested token-unset identity as mochan-tk and relayed the identity rule verbatim to the existing worker. Existing dispatch and branch remain unchanged; no replacement record is needed.

    The approved local two-file implementation and verification can resume. PR creation alone is blocked by the currently available publication routes: the designated app PR tool would use the linked account prohibited by the owner, while CLI PR creation is not an available fallback in this session without explicit fallback authorization returned by that tool. The supervisor will neither probe a prohibited write nor bypass this limitation. The worker has been instructed to prepare the exact-title draft PR body and exact-head evidence without creating a PR by either route, and to report its preserved branch/head.

    Options for coordinator/owner disposition: repair the linked-account binding to the approved owner identity and explicitly authorize the app publication route, or have the owner publish the prepared draft PR under mochan-tk and provide its URL for worker evidence and the existing reviewer sequence. No new implementation scope or approval stage is proposed. Request coordinator disposition of this publication-only blocker; label decisions remain with the coordinator. No ready, merge, approve, label, governance or candidate action is taken here.

  8. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Publication transport blocker - Task #164 supervisor

    The existing worker reports a second publication blocker after completing its authorized local two-path change: immediately after the token-unset gh identity check returned mochan-tk, env -u GH_TOKEN git push -u origin liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence failed with exit 128 / HTTP 403, permission denied to liner-takashi-kawamoto. This proves the gh API identity check did not establish the identity used by that Git transport; no root cause beyond the observed mismatch is asserted.

    Worker-preserved local head: 461e2fb, on the already dispatched branch/worktree. Worker reports author/committer mochan-tk, exactly two approved paths (+28/-2), required selected suites 10 files / 221 cases passing, surface/template/escalation/diff checks passing, counts 117/125/162/500, and a pre-edit five-case record. These are worker-reported results awaiting supervisor evidence inspection, not a Task-completion claim. The prepared PR body artifact will carry the full evidence. No PR exists or was attempted.

    The worker performed no retry, authentication workaround or configuration change. Publication remains blocked by the recorded PR-tool route constraint and this Git transport mismatch. Request coordinator/owner resolution of owner-authenticated transport and PR publication; no implementation scope change, new worker, replacement dispatch, label change or candidate action is proposed. Preserve the local commit and stop publication attempts until explicit instruction.

  9. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Outcome: blocked

    Reporter: Task #164 supervisor
    PR: None. No PR creation attempted; matching-head hosted CI and independent PR audit are unavailable until publication.
    Plan: #164 (comment)
    Approval: #164 (comment)
    Dispatch: #164 (comment)
    Identity confirmation: #164 (comment)

    The authorized local implementation is preserved, not published or accepted as a completed Task. Supervisor inspection of the actual Git object confirms base 446071c -> local head 461e2fb; commit timestamp 2026-09-29T03:02:05+09:00 follows dispatch, author/committer mochan-tk and Copilot App trailer present. Exactly two paths changed: verification/SKILL.md +27/-2 and retro-log.md +1/-0. The latter appends the 2026-09-29 JST row citing candidate #125 and owner review #118. No other implementation path changed. get_session confirms the same worker/branch; the worker reports a clean final checkout and no push retry. The supervisor read the exact diff, prepared full PR body, pre-change five-case record and final suite record, rather than rebuilding the artifact. A fresh PR query for the dispatched branch returned an empty list.

    Evidence:

    Criterion Inspected evidence and remaining obligation Result
    AC1 Approved classification: inconsistent multi-step procedure; prepared PR cites all three original occurrences 5676182941, 5701782911, 5708422404 and explains why generic SHA/count/text/ritual checks cannot measure arbitrary correction behavior. Local evidence prepared; PR publication pending
    AC2 Actual skill diff L25-L48 binds latest request/Plan/correction, pre-change base/head and relevant diff/assertions; distinguishes baseline passes; requires focused executable regression, genuine failed assertion before fix, ordered commits, identified fixed success and direct state comparisons; retains earlier evidence and upper-tier inspection; explicit docs-only branch. Procedural implementation verified locally; no runtime-enforcement claim
    AC3 Pre-change record predates asset edit; full before/after quotes in prepared PR match inspected skill diff. N1 unchanged baseline and N2 unrelated SHA rejected by request/delta mapping L25-L31; N3 surrogate/absent comparison rejected by direct named-state comparison L36-L42 while retaining real reds/hashes/order; P1 actual request-specific red/fix evidence accepted subject to other gates; P2 docs delta with checks/walkthrough accepted without fake code/tests/reds at L44-L48. Five procedural walkthroughs verified; not runtime tests or future compliance
    AC4 Two-path diff only; before/after counts AGENTS 117/117, copilot-instructions 125/125, verification 137/162, orchestration 500/500; worker records byte-preservation check of all unselected paths and prior log lines. Local scope/budgets verified; no always-on budget trade needed
    AC5 Exactly one four-cell retro row appended; previous rows unchanged in actual diff. Row implemented; human PR approval PENDING
    AC6 Full exact-title PR body prepared with Refs linkage, Plan/Approval/Dispatch, AC1-AC7, exact text walkthrough, real local commands and Deviations. No PR exists; no reviewer session created because its required PR checkpoint cannot yet occur. BLOCKED: push authentication and PR publication route; hosted CI/audit PENDING
    AC7 No merge or authorized post-merge instruction; candidate and Task remain open. PENDING; no candidate action taken

    Local verification record inspected: check-copilot-surface, check-template-sync, selected ritual/escalation-wording/ownership-overlap/retro-hygiene/tuning-status suites, diff-check, counts/status, and direct escalation-wording consumer check all reported exit 0. The final retained suite log has 10 files / 221 cases / zero failures. These compatibility checks do not substitute for the request-specific procedural walkthrough. This documentation-only Task has no invented red run or test/fix commit sequence. The worker ran exposed Rubber Duck in-loop and recorded its dispositions; it is not an independent Task audit or human approval.

    Blockers: publication-route record #164 (comment) and Git-transport record #164 (comment). A verified token-unset gh identity of mochan-tk did not establish Git transport identity: the push returned exit 128 / HTTP 403, permission denied to liner-takashi-kawamoto. No authentication workaround/configuration change or retry occurred. The designated PR-tool route remains incompatible with the owner prohibition on linked-account writes; neither route was attempted.

    Preservation: worker tool-visible ID 152eb473-d330-4964-a56d-b5c25064e0f7, app workspace ID e6a7128f-0bd7-4f1a-9ebf-833121d3eca3, branch liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence, worktree liner-takashi-kawamoto-reimagined-memory, local head above. Prepared body is task-164-pr-body.md in that worker session artifacts, SHA256 4460e77f1e741f5e37f24e6a4ced4e6f3a47458ad08cef9ee5f376ef3b9932eb; supporting records task-164-before.txt and task-164-tests-final.log. Local artifacts are recovery material, not a substitute for publishing the PR evidence. No archive/discard authorized; coordinator owns disposition.

    Deviations: owner-account handling and unresolved publication routes prevented the approved draft-PR/audit handoff. Implementation stayed within the approved two paths; no executable change, new approval stage or historical reconstruction. AC5 approval, AC6 publication/audit and AC7 are explicitly not satisfied.

    Follow-ups: coordinator/owner resolves authenticated Git transport and allowed PR publication, then explicitly resumes the existing worker for exactly one draft PR with the conditioned title. After real PR/CI readback, supervisor records Review checkpoint, creates exactly one custom reviewer and reads its non-approving PR audit, then posts a fresh Outcome. Human approval/merge authority and explicit post-merge instruction remain with coordinator. No ready/merge/approve/label/governance/candidate action and no other Task action performed.

  10. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Coordinator disposition: publication route and Git transport (owner decision) - coordinator, Epic #119

    Resolves the publication-only blockers 5875606874 and 5875697161 recorded by Task #164 supervisor. The Outcome 5875732461 (blocked) stays as the accurate record of that moment; the supervisor posts a fresh Outcome after the audit, as it planned. Scope, ownership, acceptance criteria and Approval 5875471874 are unchanged; this adds no approval stage and replaces no record. Written as mochan-tk (OWNER) with GH_TOKEN unset.

    Owner decision (publication route). Asked in the Epic #119 coordinator session on 2026-09-28 (answered between 18:01Z and 18:14Z UTC), the owner chose: the worker pushes its branch as mochan-tk and the coordinator publishes the prepared body unchanged as the DRAFT PR with env -u GH_TOKEN gh pr create --draft, then hands the URL to the supervisor. This changes only who runs gh pr create in the Approval's execution authority and in confirmation 5875589353; the worker keeps its branch, its commit and all PR-evidence duties, and the supervisor keeps review, checkpoint and Outcome duties. The app PR tool is not used: it writes under the linked account, and it covers only the calling session's own branch.

    Transport (coordinator resolution within the owner's identity decision). The HTTPS push fails because the app-configured Git credential helper supplies the linked account's token even when GH_TOKEN is unset (record 5875697161: exit 128, HTTP 403, permission denied to liner-takashi-kawamoto). The owner's SSH key authenticates as the owner account: on 2026-09-28 at approx. 18:31Z the coordinator observed ssh -T git@github.com print Hi mochan-tk! You've successfully authenticated, but GitHub does not provide shell access., and git push --dry-run --porcelain git@github.com:mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot.git 461e2fb2e58fd2fd8a276bc6dcf7fd4f38d3d48d:refs/heads/liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence reported [new branch] and Done with exit 0, sending no data (the remote still has no such branch). The worker therefore pushes over SSH with an explicit URL and refspec, changing no remote, credential or Git configuration and setting no upstream:

    env -u GH_TOKEN git push git@github.com:mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot.git 461e2fb2e58fd2fd8a276bc6dcf7fd4f38d3d48d:refs/heads/liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence
    

    Sequence.

    1. The supervisor relays this comment's link and the sequence to its worker 152eb473-d330-4964-a56d-b5c25064e0f7.
    2. The worker verifies ssh -T git@github.com names mochan-tk, git rev-parse HEAD is 461e2fb2e58fd2fd8a276bc6dcf7fd4f38d3d48d, git status --short is empty and task-164-pr-body.md still has SHA256 4460e77f1e741f5e37f24e6a4ced4e6f3a47458ad08cef9ee5f376ef3b9932eb; runs the push above once; confirms env -u GH_TOKEN git ls-remote origin refs/heads/liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence returns that SHA; and reports to the supervisor. On any failure it stops without retrying or working around it.
    3. The supervisor verifies the remote head and sends the coordinator one hop: branch, head SHA, body path and SHA256.
    4. The coordinator re-verifies those facts, the ledger and origin/main, then runs env -u GH_TOKEN gh pr create --draft --repo mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot --base main --head liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence --title 'retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence' --body-file <that body file>, reads back author, draft state, head SHA, title and body equality, posts nothing else on the PR, and sends the URL to the supervisor.
    5. The worker then maintains the PR evidence as mochan-tk (body updates through REST, env -u GH_TOKEN gh api -X PATCH repos/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/pulls/<number> -F body=@<file>), adding the matching-head CI readbacks and a Deviations entry for this publication route and transport that links this comment. The supervisor continues per Approval 5875471874: ## Review checkpoint, exactly one custom reviewer session with a non-approving PR audit, then a fresh ## Outcome before its one-hop report.

    Unchanged. No ready, merge, approve, label, ruleset, variable or workflow action; no action on #125 before the coordinator's post-merge instruction; AC5 human approval of the retro-log row remains a separate owner decision on the PR. No label is applied for the recorded blockers because the owner decided in session and this comment resolves them.

  11. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Evidence publication handoff - Task #164 supervisor

    PR #169 now exists as an OPEN draft by mochan-tk, with the exact approved title and head 461e2fb. Supervisor independently read all five checks as passing (CI run 36466919136, ritual run 36466919206), the two-path +28/-2 diff, actual base a897a67 and merge-base 446071c. The only intervening main-path change is platform-capability-baseline.tsv; no branch update or scope change is performed.

    The existing worker is preparing the post-publication evidence body, but reports that its available PR-edit tool route requires the designated updater and does not permit the requested direct REST update. The owner prohibits the linked-account updater, so the worker has attempted neither route. Request coordinator publication of the prepared evidence body under the owner account, analogous to the creation handoff in disposition 5876152046, followed by exact body/head readback. This changes only the publisher, not implementation, evidence ownership or audit requirements. No new worker/reviewer, no authentication workaround, no ready/merge/approve/label/candidate action. Review checkpoint and the single independent reviewer follow the durably updated PR evidence.

  12. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Coordinator resolution: publisher of PR #169 body updates - coordinator, Epic #119

    Resolves the evidence-publication handoff 5876323939 within the owner's identity decision (confirmation 5875589353) and publication-route decision (disposition 5876152046). Written as mochan-tk (OWNER) with GH_TOKEN unset. It changes only who transmits the PR #169 body text: the content, the worker's evidence ownership, scope, ownership, acceptance criteria, Approval 5875471874 and the audit duties are unchanged, and it amends only step 5 of the coordinator's own disposition 5876152046, which had assigned body updates to the worker.

    The worker's session tools route PR body edits through the app's PR updater, which writes under the linked account the owner excluded, so the worker attempted neither that updater nor a direct REST update. The coordinator's app updater has the same linked-account problem, so the owner-account route is a REST call run by the coordinator:

    1. For each update, the supervisor inspects the worker's body file and sends the coordinator one hop with its path and SHA256.
    2. The coordinator verifies the SHA256, that PR retro: Prevent baseline checks from substituting for requested implementation evidence #169 is still OPEN and DRAFT at head 461e2fb2e58fd2fd8a276bc6dcf7fd4f38d3d48d (or at the head the supervisor names if a later commit was made within the Approval), that the text is ASCII, keeps Refs #164 and contains no closing-keyword phrase; then runs env -u GH_TOKEN gh api -X PATCH repos/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/pulls/169 -F body=@<file>; reads back body equality and the head; changes nothing else (title, base, draft state, labels, reviewers); and replies to the supervisor with the result.
    3. The coordinator neither writes nor alters the body text. Any content defect goes back to the worker through the supervisor; a failed check means no PATCH.

    This standing resolution covers every body update of PR #169 until the PR is merged or closed, including the linkage update after the audit and the Outcome. The Epic #119 record lists each published SHA256. The same identity rule applies to the reviewer's audit: it is published as mochan-tk (for a top-level PR comment, env -u GH_TOKEN gh api -X POST repos/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/issues/169/comments -F body=@<file>), or, if the reviewer's tools cannot do that, through the skill's requester-publication fallback with its provenance stated. No ready, merge, approve, label or candidate action is taken here.

  13. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Review checkpoint

    Task #164 supervisor independently verified PR #169 before dispatching the single custom reviewer: OPEN/DRAFT, author mochan-tk, exact conditioned title, head 461e2fb, base main a897a67, merge-base 446071c. Diff is exactly the two approved paths (+28/-2); the intervening main change is disjoint platform baseline data.

    The PR body was published by the coordinator under owner-account standing resolution 5876376936, without changing worker-authored content. Supervisor independently compared REST-parsed body bytes against the frozen prepared file: equal, SHA256 167fe3d6afd79f6275fdff20f9f49233407682bcdeb72c8d45c5317089a70b39. It includes all AC rows, original occurrence links, exact five-case before/after walkthrough, actual local evidence, base facts and explicit publication/transport deviations. AC5 human approval and AC7 remain pending; AC6 independent audit is next.

    All five current checks pass: quality, copilot-surface, scaffold-self-check and windows-launcher from run 36466919136; latest task-ritual from run 36468097809. The latest ritual run is pull_request, completed/success, exact head 461e2fb. No suite was rebuilt by the supervisor. Earlier blocked Outcome 5875732461 remains unchanged historical evidence.

    Next: create exactly one custom reviewer session, agent reviewer, explicit gpt-6-astra/autopilot, coordination false, no base_branch, to audit this Task/Plan/Approval/two-path claim and publish one non-approving PR audit. Reviewer must use GH_TOKEN-unset gh/git and verify mochan-tk before any write; if top-level comment publication is unavailable, return its audit marked unrecorded for requester publication with provenance. The existing Refs linkage is required for this post-merge Task; no automatic closing link or formal approval. The supervisor owns the fresh Outcome after reading the durable audit. No ready, merge, approve, label, governance or candidate action is authorized.

  14. mochan-tk commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Outcome: blocked

    Reporter: Task #164 supervisor
    PR: #169, OPEN/DRAFT, head 461e2fb, base main a897a67, merge-base 446071c. No merge or formal approval exists.

    Implementation, publication and the required independent audit are now verified. The earlier blocked Outcome 5875732461 remains accurate historical evidence of resolved publication issues. This Outcome remains blocked ONLY on the existing human PR approval/merge authority and post-merge AC7, not an implementation defect or a new approval stage.

    Evidence:

    Criterion Evidence and actual result Result
    AC1 PR classification and all three original occurrence links; approved Plan 5746377879; independent audit 5876549628 verifies inconsistent multi-step evidence procedure and honest feasible-host/runtime limits. verified
    AC2 Actual verification skill L25-L48 plus L97-L98 binds latest request, base/head, relevant diff/assertions; executable focused regression/genuine red/ordered test-fix/fixed capture, direct comparisons, preserved earlier evidence and upper-tier inspection, docs-only/mixed distinction. Audit found no implementation gap. verified procedural implementation; no future-compliance claim
    AC3 Five predeclared Plan cases and pre-edit exact-text record; published before/after N1/N2/N3/P1/P2 walkthrough. Reviewer independently matched all 14 quoted blocks against immutable before/after sources and verified decisions. No invented runtime tests or historical reds. verified procedural walkthrough
    AC4 Exactly verification/SKILL.md +27/-2 and retro-log.md +1/-0; all unselected paths unchanged against merge-base. Counts 117/125/162/500 preserve ceilings; always-on files unchanged, no budget trade. verified
    AC5 One actual-date four-cell row with #125 and #118; prior retro-log bytes preserved. No human approval is recorded on the PR; risk approval and audit do not substitute. row verified; human approval PENDING
    AC6 One exact-title DRAFT PR, Refs linkage, full template, Plan/Approval/Dispatch, complete evidence and honest Deviations. Review checkpoint 5876451371 precedes creation of exactly one custom reviewer; its owner-authored non-approving audit is linked below. verified draft/audit deliverable
    AC7 PR mergedAt null; no coordinator post-merge instruction, candidate fix-link/disposition or Task manual disposition. PENDING

    Independent audit: #169 (comment) . Recommended disposition: pass for implementation/evidence audit, no corrective implementation change requested; AC5 and AC7 expressly pending. Reviewer tool-visible session 771177fe-02c5-4b83-9dd4-55bbfecab637, app session 933ed987-ffdb-4049-9ff6-33cc1b0cd7e7, custom reviewer/gpt-6-astra/autopilot, coordination false. Supervisor read the complete audit and verified author mochan-tk/OWNER, unedited publication, matching head and current checks. No second reviewer exists or is needed.

    Current verification: all five checks pass at exact head: quality/copilot-surface/scaffold-self-check/windows-launcher from https://github.com/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/actions/runs/36466919136 ; latest task-ritual from https://github.com/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/actions/runs/36468097809 . Worker mandatory local suites report 10 files / 221 cases / zero failures, plus surface/template/direct-consumer/diff/status/count evidence. Supervisor and reviewer inspected records instead of duplicating suites. Compatibility green is not substituted for AC2/AC3. PR stays draft, formal reviews empty, mergedAt null.

    Deviations: resolved owner-authorized transport/publication route only: failed HTTPS push preserved historically; exact-ref SSH push and coordinator publication of unchanged worker-authored body under owner identity, with standing publisher resolution 5876376936. Relevant owner records: 5875589353 and 5876152046. No implementation scope change, new approval stage, code/test edits, workflow/check weakening or candidate/history mutation. The worker will prepare an evidence-only linkage update for this audit and Outcome; the coordinator publishes exact inspected bytes per the standing resolution.

    Follow-ups: coordinator obtains the owner decision on PR approval and merge. Only after verified merge and explicit instruction may the supervisor perform AC7 candidate fix-link/manual disposition and Task post-merge evidence/Outcome/manual disposition. Preserve existing worker and reviewer sessions for rework/leaf-first teardown; no archive/discard now. No ready/merge/approve/label/governance/candidate action taken by this supervisor.

  15. mochan-tk commented on Sep 29, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Outcome: completed

    Reporter: Task #164 supervisor
    PR: #169, MERGED at 2026-09-29T00:50:01Z; merge commit 70c729c, implementation head 461e2fb. Supervisor independently read mergedAt, merge commit and exactly the two approved files after the coordinator sent the explicit AC7 post-merge instruction on 2026-09-29.

    Evidence:

    Criterion Verified evidence Result
    AC1 Plan 5746377879 and merged PR classify the inconsistent multi-step evidence procedure, cite all three original occurrences 5676182941/5701782911/5708422404, and justify the skill host without claiming generic SHA/count/checks prove behavior. Independent audit 5876549628 verifies the classification and limits. verified
    AC2 Merged verification skill request-binding procedure, executable focused regression/genuine red/ordered test-fix/fixed capture, actual state comparisons, retained credited evidence, upper-tier record inspection and docs-only/mixed distinction; exact head audited with no corrective gaps. verified
    AC3 Predeclared N1/N2/N3/P1/P2, pre-edit capture, full published before/after walkthrough and 14 source-matched blocks verified by independent audit. This is procedural evidence, not fabricated runtime enforcement or historical reds. verified
    AC4 Merged diff only verification/SKILL.md +27/-2 and retro-log.md +1/-0. Budgets 117/125/162/500, unselected paths and old log rows unchanged; surface/compatibility evidence and independent audit pass. verified
    AC5 Exactly one four-cell row dated 2026-09-29 JST cites #125/#118. Human approval on PR 5881486887 explicitly covers both retro-log and procedure; timing correction 5881498532 places owner decision approx. 2026-09-29T00:47Z and refreshed checks before merge. This is distinct from risk approval and the non-approving audit. verified
    AC6 Exactly one PR #169 with conditioned exact title, required Refs linkage/full template/Plan/evidence/Deviations; checkpoint 5876451371, exactly one custom reviewer and non-approving audit 5876549628; final body fa1240bf2d0e8429f4fbaa8cd018ceccacee7857af74f15e2f5ebc3344817eea linked audit and prior Outcome before owner GO. verified
    AC7 Independently verified mergedAt; appended exactly one fix-link record to candidate #125 (5881521671), read it back, manually marked candidate completed, verified REST state=closed/state_reason=completed/closed_at=2026-09-29T00:51:31Z and three comments including untouched original occurrences. This post-merge Outcome is recorded before the authorized manual Task disposition. verified

    Durable post-merge links:

    Deviations: disclosed owner-authorized SSH transport and coordinator transmission of worker-authored PR body per 5875589353/5876152046/5876376936 only; no implementation scope change, new approval stage, rewritten history or weakened check. Earlier blocked Outcomes remain unchanged and accurately describe their earlier states. No edit of the merged PR body is attempted; this record supplies final post-merge status.

    Follow-ups: after readback of this Outcome, manually mark Task #164 completed and verify its state, then report the comment ids and dispositions to the coordinator. Retain worker and reviewer without teardown until the coordinator separately verifies AC7 and instructs leaf-first teardown. No branch deletion, labels, governance changes or other-issue actions are authorized or performed.

  16. mochan-tk commented on Sep 29, 2026

    @mochan-tk
    OwnerAuthor

    Releasing worker: Task #164 worker (session 152eb473-d330-4964-a56d-b5c25064e0f7), branch liner-takashi-kawamoto-task-164-retro-completion-evidence

    Task: #164

    Closeout only: no new Plan, replacement worker, implementation release or scope change. Task #164 supervisor acts on the explicit Epic #119 coordinator teardown instruction after independent AC7 verification and the recorded owner GO #169 (comment) (timing correction 5881498532).

    PR #169 merged 2026-09-29T00:50:01Z as 70c729c, retaining implementation head 461e2fb. Candidate fix-link 5881521671 and completed Outcome 5881527645 precede the verified completed dispositions of #125 and #164.

    Pre-teardown ground truth: authoritative session status reports both children idle and is_running=false, with no input or Plan gate. Worker 152eb473-d330-4964-a56d-b5c25064e0f7 (app workspace e6a7128f-0bd7-4f1a-9ebf-833121d3eca3) has empty git status, HEAD 461e2fb equal to the retained remote branch. There is no uncommitted work. Implementation is preserved in the retained branch and merged PR; evidence is preserved in the PR, audit and Task records. Reviewer 771177fe-02c5-4b83-9dd4-55bbfecab637 (app workspace 933ed987-ffdb-4049-9ff6-33cc1b0cd7e7) has empty status, zero working diff, HEAD a897a67 and no implementation work to preserve; its durable audit is PR comment 5876549628. Local scratch artifacts are disposable evidence copies, not unrecorded deliverables.

    Disposition authority: Epic #119 coordinator under the owner GO and explicit teardown instruction; Task #164 supervisor executes only this closeout. After this comment is read back unedited, archive the worker first and verify archived=true; only then verify/archive the reviewer and confirm archived=true. Preserve both remote branches and all GitHub records. No branch deletion, label changes, existing-comment edits, other-issue action or self-archive. Report both archive confirmations to the coordinator; it alone handles the supervisor teardown afterward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    ai:readyBrief meets the planner quality bar; dispatchable when unblockedexec:appRoute: Copilot app session — steerable, worktree-isolatedrisk:highException gate: pause after the plan comment until approved (default is pass-through)type:taskSelf-contained work order for one agent session

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions