Skip to content

test: preserve BLAKE3 result across status query - #112

Merged
Th0rgal merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
test/blake3-result-pending-status-query
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

Th0rgal merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
test/blake3-result-pending-status-query

Conversation

@Th0rgal

@Th0rgal Th0rgal commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • add one bounded, host-prepared full-LSC-1 BLAKE3 trace: BLAKE3_REQUEST -> SERVICE_RESPONSE -> STATUS_QUERY -> RETIRE
  • compare executable-model and authored-RTL response frames byte-for-byte under deterministic finite RX/TX stalls
  • require INFO to report RESULT_PENDING, txn 0x10203040, prior OK, and zero retire/fault/committed state
  • prove STATUS preserves the staged BLAKE3 result and untouched RETIRE commits exactly once
  • add a compiling mutation that removes blake_result_pending from STATUS txn-id selection and require the differential to kill it

Production RTL is unchanged. Lean is unchanged.

Validation

  • make lsc1-blake3-status-host-boundary
  • make lsc1-blake3-status-host-boundary-mutation
  • make check
  • make checksum-check

All pass locally from exact main 65cc6ba5eb1752a6ef769055f4c16e51f651c4dd.

Claim boundary

This PR provides bounded executable-model and authored-RTL simulation evidence only. It makes no universal refinement, unbounded, end-to-end, Lean, netlist, P&R, FPGA, hardware, LSC-1µ, fetch, or memory claim.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-04T01:10:26.557495Z b7403f5 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3d25e1b6df

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread Makefile Outdated
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 $(PYTHON) tools/lsc1_blake3_status_host_boundary.py

lsc1-blake3-status-host-boundary-mutation:
@d=$$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$$d"' EXIT; \

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Fail the mutation target when prerequisite commands fail

Without set -e, failures from cp, the source-pattern assertion, sed, or the diagnostic grep are ignored because the final echo determines the recipe's exit status. For example, running this target with PYTHON=false exits successfully and prints compile_elaboration=PASS behavioral_kill=PASS; similarly, a simulator or compilation failure makes the Python command take the expected-failure path, then the failed diagnostic check is ignored. This can therefore record a successful mutation kill without compiling or exercising the mutant.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread Makefile
@Th0rgal

Th0rgal commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: b7403f564c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Th0rgal
Th0rgal merged commit 27181e1 into main Sep 4, 2026
48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant