Removing RMLFNMLTC0001-CSV and Updating Cases 102, 103, and 104

[eiglesias34]

No description provided.

[bjdmeest]

Why should RNMLTC0001 be removed? This removes the use case of using functions without parameters. I do not agree with that removal

[eiglesias34]

Hello @bjdmeest,

The main reason this test case was removed was that the function's result was always random, making it impossible to consider it "passed" or "failed". For the last two editions of the challenge, that was always the main complaint about RML-FMNL. Therefore, the test case was removed.

With that being said, you do bring up a good point about having a function with no parameters. I propose adding RNMLTC0001 again, but this time with a different function that produces a much more consistent result. If you have any ideas, please share them with me.

Sincerely,
Enrique

[bjdmeest]

Easiest path forward would be to create a dummy function alwaysReturnsABC() that... always returns the string "ABC" :D

[eiglesias34]

Hello @bjdmeest,

I made a new PR with the new RMLFNMLTC0001-CSV.