Repository navigation
Distinguish explicit from implicit preferences when writing memory (v0.2.9) - #6
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…0.2.9). A one-off edit request inside a specific piece of work was being stored as a standing rule, so unrelated future work inherited a preference the user never stated. Implicit requests now stay qualified to what was asked and the situation it happened in, and only apply when the current work resembles that scenario. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Test plan
claude plugin validate plugins/zep-memory/.claude-plugin/plugin.json --strictclaude plugin validate . --strictpython3 scripts/plugin_manifests.py --checkpython3 scripts/validate_agent_plugin.py.github/workflows/test-plugin.ymlpassesMade with Cursor