Skip to content

Refactor execution_support to resolve SRP violation in execution database mod - #38

Open
celsowm wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
srp-execution-support-16984110117171531336
Open

Refactor execution_support to resolve SRP violation in execution database mod#38
celsowm wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
srp-execution-support-16984110117171531336

Conversation

@celsowm

@celsowm celsowm commented Apr 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR addresses an SRP violation described in docs/srp-violations.md. The helper module execution_support.rs mixed concerns like session access, context building, and batch execution loop logic. It has been removed and its functions extracted to three separate files:

  • session_access.rs (with_session)
  • context_builder.rs (build_execution_context)
  • batch_runner.rs (execute_batch_core_inner, etc.)
    The main execution.rs file now acts as a facade importing these focused modules.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 16984110117171531336 started by @celsowm

… builder, batch runner, and session access.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant