[dependabot]

Bumps pytest-asyncio from 1.4.1 to 1.4.1.post1.

Release notes

Sourced from pytest-asyncio's releases.

pytest-asyncio v1.4.1.post1

1.4.1.post1 - 2026-11-01

Changed

• Removed the upper version bound on the pytest dependency. (#1605)

Commits

• e420349 Bump mypy pre-commit hook to v2.4.0 (#1601)
• 16a1ba4 chore: Prepare release of v1.4.1.post1.
• 7087e7f build: drop pytest upper bound (#1605) (#1606)
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.57%. Comparing base (57b00c8) to head (73062fe).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #818   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.57%   98.57%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1408     1408           
  Branches       74       74           
=======================================
  Hits         1388     1388           
  Misses         17       17           
  Partials        3        3           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	97.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will improve performance by ×18

3 warnings

⚠️ 16 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 1 benchmark with a significant change ran on different hardware

Its base and head results were measured on machines with a different CPU, core count or memory, so the change might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 1 benchmark with a significant change ran in a different software environment

Its base and head results were measured with a different OS or toolchain, such as compiler, runtime or library versions, so the change might come from this difference rather than from the code. Open the benchmark to see what changed.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 62 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	test_cache_hit_benchmark[func-bounded-ttl]	196.1 ms	11.2 ms	×18

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing dependabot/pip/pytest-asyncio-1.4.1.post1 (73062fe) with master (57b00c8)²}

Footnotes

1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on master (e78c711) during the generation of this report, so 57b00c8 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩