[CLIENT-5055] Document breaking changes for write, operate, apply, batch write, and batch apply policies' "key" option that now uses union precedence - #1154
Merged
juliannguyen4 merged 29 commits intoJul 22, 2026
Conversation
juliannguyen4
changed the title
juliannguyen4
changed the base branch from
dev
to
CLIENT-5057-document-string-ops-behavior-when-bin-is-missing
July 15, 2026 22:27
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #1154 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.38% 85.38%
=======================================
Files 101 101
Lines 14608 14608
=======================================
Hits 12473 12473
Misses 2135 2135 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
juliannguyen4
changed the title
…n. I'm not sure if read policy would cause read commands to store the user key, and sending the key for remove/batch_remove doesn't make sense to me. TODO - apply/batch_apply policies hasn't been finished yet
…s union precedence now that the tests have verified that behavior.
…apply, batch_write, and batch_apply policies.
…ly inherit from config level policy options if the latter is not passed as an argument.
… applied when config level policy sends the key but command level policies overrides that option to false
…ser key but not a specific value. only remove keys that were inserted during teardown
…recedence.py use a unique set name. This makes sure each test case performs a query that cannot pick up leftover keys from previous tests.
…set defined for each test case.
… that aren't declared in the dynamic config's yaml schema and addresses the warnings reported in the client logs re: this.
…ses invalid chars for set names.
… the side effects can be inspected after a test run that uses a unique set name
… test case failures.
juliannguyen4
force-pushed
the
CLIENT-5055-document-send_key-breaking-changes
branch
from
July 20, 2026 21:22
1b2d3a8 to
87f3193
Compare
juliannguyen4
changed the base branch from
CLIENT-5057-document-string-ops-behavior-when-bin-is-missing
to
dev
July 20, 2026 21:23
juliannguyen4
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 20, 2026 21:33
…end_key-breaking-changes
atripathi-aerospike
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This affects the "key" option for these policies across dynamic config (wherever applicable), client config, and command level policies
Manual testing
TODO
https://aerospike-python-client--1154.org.readthedocs.build/en/1154/client.html#write-policies