Skip to content

[Bug] Generation of a backtrace for a "System" failure fails with "Failed to generate microreport from the problem data". #389

Open
Open
[Bug] Generation of a backtrace for a "System" failure fails with "Failed to generate microreport from the problem data".#389

Description

@beedell-roke
beedell-roke
opened on Aug 26, 2025

An Example

When processed, I saw:

Image

Details

Failed to generate microreport from the problem data

Unfortunately, abrt immediately deleted it, rather like discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/162891 describes (although more similarly to when it locates a duplicate). 1

Environment

#!/usr/bin/env sh
rpm -qa | grep abrt
abrt-libs-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-dbus-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
python3-abrt-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-addon-kerneloops-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-addon-pstoreoops-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-addon-vmcore-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-addon-xorg-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-plugin-bodhi-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
python3-abrt-addon-2.17.6-4.fc42.noarch
gnome-abrt-1.4.3-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-gui-libs-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-gui-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-addon-ccpp-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-tui-2.17.6-4.fc42.noarch
abrt-cli-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64
abrt-desktop-2.17.6-4.fc42.x86_64

Tangential

This is an example of when #378 (comment) might be useful, considering that it might pertain to bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391169#c0.

Activity

  1. beedell-roke commented on Aug 28, 2025

    @beedell-roke
    beedell-roke
    on Aug 28, 2025
    Author

    #389 (comment)

    I've had this reproduce again:

    Image

    However, because abrt required > 2 mins to delete it, undermentioned are its logs, attached as oops-2025-08-28-14.24.25-3117-0.tar.gz:

    .
├── abrt_version
├── analyzer
├── architecture
├── backtrace
├── cmdline
├── event_log
├── hostname
├── kernel
├── last_occurrence
├── .libreport
│   └── owner
├── os_info
├── os_release
├── proc_modules
├── reason
├── suspend_stats
├── time
└── type

2 directories, 17 files

    However, the reason differs (of what I recall, libreport-plugin-kerneloops-2.17.15-5.fc42.x86_64 states what bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518943 describes.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions