fix(security): correct AM62L removing R5 SPL reference#690
fix(security): correct AM62L removing R5 SPL reference#690jeevantelukula merged 1 commit intoTexasInstruments:masterfrom
Conversation
Correct existing diagram showing R5 SPL for AM62L as well. Add reference to fTPM based secure storage guide. Signed-off-by: Shiva Tripathi <s-tripathi1@ti.com>
shiva-ti
requested review from
StaticRocket,
VeeruPrudhvi,
cshilwant,
gehariprasath,
jeevantelukula,
praneethbajjuri and
uditkumarti
as code owners
github-actions
Bot
assigned
devarsht,
gehariprasath,
praneethbajjuri,
r-vignesh and
uditkumarti
|
Kind of a general comment: Do we want to mask this stuff with the AM62L platform or define a new configuration parameter to describe bootflows that do not use R5. I assume this will include other platforms in the future. |
Yes we could use a "R5-SPL" config to differentiate. But I see AM62L being used across the doc at present for this distinction, specifically in bootflow the information is very platform specific, might have to add more branches of R5-SPL going ahead to completely skip using platforms. So kept it as is for now |
10 participants
Correct existing diagram showing R5 SPL for AM62L as well. Add reference to fTPM based secure storage guide.