AI guidelines workshop for onboarding module#380
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for cyf-workshop ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for cyf-workshops canceled.
|
Poonam-raj
requested review from
Liam310,
LonMcGregor,
cifarquhar and
illicitonion
|
Q: was it correct to build this into a workshop and not a block in the curriculum repo? |
| After the 5 minutes is up, **set a timer for 10 minutes.** As a group discussing the following questions: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. What more general skills we are trying to build during the ITP (_which AI use could disrupt_)? | ||
| 2. What is an example of **acceptable** AI use? | ||
| 3. What kind of AI use is **not acceptable** during the ITP? | ||
| 4. How can you check if AI use is disrupting your learning? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly considering the London cohort, do you think it would be productive to have this discussion with 40 trainees? Or is it worth adding a stipulation to suggest groups no bigger than 10, maybe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes great point, I was thinking about tiny WMs
|
@Liam310 Does it read clear with the amendment? I've kinda expanded by having small group discussion, sharing answers wider, then going into questions |
|
|
||
| There might be multiple different approaches to the questions. Discuss and see if there is a consensus across the group. | ||
|
|
||
| **Set a timer for 4 minutes and as a entire ITP class**, the facilitator should popcorn around the different groups and get one answer for each of the questions. Specifically looking for any big misconceptions across the class. These are worth raising in Slack as it might be an indicator of clarification needed in the guidelines. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the purpose of this paragraph to enhance the workshop for trainees, or is this a task specifically for the facilitator to feed back to us?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Feedback to us - reckon it's muddying this up?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might be worth having this focus only on "finding misconceptions" and popcorning around the group through discussion (not specifically being led by the facilitator only), and then at the very end of the workshop we could have a note specifically for the facilitator to feed back to us.
I think yes for now as it's a distinct activity rather than something reusable, but there's an open issue on the curriculum repo looking at moving the workshops across there. AFAIK it's still work in progress. |
4 participants
Goals: