PEP 823 + 824: Update post-history (#5215)

Author: cdce8p

peps/pep-0823.rst

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
 Created: 20-Sep-2026
 Python-Version: 3.16
-Post-History: `22-Sep-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-823-none-aware-access-operators/109159>`__
+Post-History: `22-Sep-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-823-none-aware-access-operators/109159>`__,
+              `01-Nov-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-823-none-aware-access-operators/109159/117>`__,
 
 
 Abstract
@@ -1465,8 +1466,8 @@ Change History
 
   - Added `None-aware binary operators`_ and
     `Add ? as shortcut for is not None`_ as rejected ideas.
-  - Mention :pep:`661` Sentinel Values in `No-Value Protocol`_ and added
-    `Use custom sentinels instead of None`_ to common objections.
+  - Mentioned :pep:`661` Sentinel Values in `No-Value Protocol`_ and
+    added `Use custom sentinels instead of None`_ to common objections.
   - Added `Not pythonic or not explicit enough`_ to common objections.
   - Extended Just use `... a traversal library`_ to include a more
     complex example which highlights the limitations of traversal

peps/pep-0824.rst

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
 Created: 20-Sep-2026
 Python-Version: 3.16
-Post-History: `22-Sep-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-824-none-coalescing-operators/109161>`__
+Post-History: `22-Sep-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-824-none-coalescing-operators/109161>`__,
+              `01-Nov-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-824-none-coalescing-operators/109161/74>`__,
 
 
 Abstract