Problem
import-dir can upload a secondary artifact before its primary API definition. For example, a directory containing examples.yaml and openapi.yaml uploads examples.yaml with primary=false first, then openapi.yaml with primary=true.
ImportDirectory uploads files in their discovery order. RealFileSystem uses filepath.Walk, so lexical filename order determines which artifact is uploaded first; the files are not grouped by primary/secondary status.
The multi-artifact documentation explains that a secondary artifact is ignored when its matching API name/version does not yet exist. On a first import, this ordering can therefore leave the API without the examples from its secondary artifact.
Expected behavior
Upload primary artifacts before secondary artifacts, regardless of filename order, so the API definition exists before its secondary artifacts are imported.
Reproduction test
Tested on upstream master at e54dc4719d1f14085f5bb551a910139628babbbc, with go version go1.26.5 darwin/arm64 (macOS, ARM64).
Save this as cmd/import_order_regression_test.go and run:
go test ./cmd -run '^TestReviewImportDirPrimaryOrder$' -count=1 -v
The test calls the production ImportDirectory with RealFileSystem and records calls to the upload client. Fixture contents are placeholders because the recording client does not parse them.
package cmd
import (
"fmt"
"os"
"path/filepath"
"testing"
)
type reviewUploadClient struct{ calls []string }
func (c *reviewUploadClient) UploadArtifact(path string, primary bool) (string, error) {
c.calls = append(c.calls, fmt.Sprintf("%s primary=%t", filepath.Base(path), primary))
return "accepted", nil
}
func TestReviewImportDirPrimaryOrder(t *testing.T) {
dir := t.TempDir()
for _, name := range []string{"examples.yaml", "openapi.yaml"} {
if err := os.WriteFile(filepath.Join(dir, name), []byte("fixture"), 0600); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
client := &reviewUploadClient{}
result, err := ImportDirectory(client, &RealFileSystem{}, dir, ImportConfig{})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
t.Logf("upload order: %v; success=%d failed=%d", client.calls, result.SuccessCount, result.FailedCount)
if client.calls[0] != "openapi.yaml primary=true" {
t.Errorf("secondary artifact uploaded before the primary API definition")
}
}
Actual test output
For the recorded run, the test file was supplied through a temporary Go overlay to leave the checkout unchanged:
go test -overlay=/tmp/microcks-import-order-overlay.json ./cmd -run '^TestReviewImportDirPrimaryOrder$' -count=1 -v
=== RUN TestReviewImportDirPrimaryOrder
Microcks has completed 'accepted'
Microcks has discovered 'accepted'
import_order_regression_test.go:29: upload order: [examples.yaml primary=false openapi.yaml primary=true]; success=2 failed=0
import_order_regression_test.go:31: secondary artifact uploaded before the primary API definition
--- FAIL: TestReviewImportDirPrimaryOrder (0.00s)
FAIL
FAIL github.com/microcks/microcks-cli/cmd 0.917s
FAIL
Exit status: 1. The secondary artifact was uploaded first.
This test confirms the CLI upload order only. The accepted responses and success counters come from the recording client, not a live Microcks server. The missing-examples impact follows from the documented secondary-artifact behavior; I have not run a live-server reproduction.
A possible fix is to stably group the discovered files by IsPrimary before uploading them, keeping the existing relative order within each group.
I searched existing issues and PRs for import-dir ordering/primary/secondary reports and found no matching report. PR #459 concerns import-url success-message wording, not directory upload ordering.
Problem
import-dircan upload a secondary artifact before its primary API definition. For example, a directory containingexamples.yamlandopenapi.yamluploadsexamples.yamlwithprimary=falsefirst, thenopenapi.yamlwithprimary=true.ImportDirectory uploads files in their discovery order.
RealFileSystemusesfilepath.Walk, so lexical filename order determines which artifact is uploaded first; the files are not grouped by primary/secondary status.The multi-artifact documentation explains that a secondary artifact is ignored when its matching API name/version does not yet exist. On a first import, this ordering can therefore leave the API without the examples from its secondary artifact.
Expected behavior
Upload primary artifacts before secondary artifacts, regardless of filename order, so the API definition exists before its secondary artifacts are imported.
Reproduction test
Tested on upstream
masterate54dc4719d1f14085f5bb551a910139628babbbc, withgo version go1.26.5 darwin/arm64(macOS, ARM64).Save this as
cmd/import_order_regression_test.goand run:The test calls the production
ImportDirectorywithRealFileSystemand records calls to the upload client. Fixture contents are placeholders because the recording client does not parse them.Actual test output
For the recorded run, the test file was supplied through a temporary Go overlay to leave the checkout unchanged:
Exit status: 1. The secondary artifact was uploaded first.
This test confirms the CLI upload order only. The
acceptedresponses and success counters come from the recording client, not a live Microcks server. The missing-examples impact follows from the documented secondary-artifact behavior; I have not run a live-server reproduction.A possible fix is to stably group the discovered files by
IsPrimarybefore uploading them, keeping the existing relative order within each group.I searched existing issues and PRs for
import-dirordering/primary/secondary reports and found no matching report. PR #459 concernsimport-urlsuccess-message wording, not directory upload ordering.