Skip to content

Evidence for #2959: 7x duplicate edge-case findings across 18 review runs on PR #2932 #3541

Description

@fullsend-ai-retro

What happened

The review agent raised substantively identical edge-case findings on internal/cli/migrate.go 7 times and internal/harness/diff.go 4 times across review rounds on PR #2932. The author dismissed 11 of 23 total findings as design limitations, but the bot re-raised them each cycle. 18 completed review runs occurred (11 on July 4 alone) during a fix-review-fix loop.

What could go better

The review agent should track previously-raised findings and author responses to avoid re-raising the same issue after it has been acknowledged or dismissed. This would dramatically reduce noise — on this PR, at least 14 of the 23 findings were substantive duplicates of earlier findings that had already been addressed or dismissed.

Proposed change

This is additional evidence for existing issue #2959 (review agent dedup across re-review iterations). Also provides evidence for #2587 (18 dispatches on one PR) and #2333 (18/23 findings low severity, mostly dismissed as design limitations).

Validation criteria

N/A — evidence filing for existing tracker issues #2959, #2587, #2333.


Generated by retro agent from #2932

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    duplicateThis issue or pull request already exists

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    Status
    Done

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions