I found an issue with how sub-agent messages are persisted and represented in the UI.
When the supervisor agent assigns a task to a sub-agent, that task is saved as a user message under the supervisor agent.
The sub-agent's response is saved under the supervisor as an assistant message, with metadata containing the sub-agent ID and name.
However, the original sub-agent task/user message does not contain sub-agent metadata such as subagentId or subagentName.
Because of this, the UI cannot reliably filter or identify sub-agent assistant messages vs. sub-agent user/task messages.
Expected behavior
Both sides of the sub-agent interaction should include consistent metadata, for example:
{
"subagentId": "...",
"subagentName": "..."
}
The metadata should be attached to the sub-agent task/user message as well as the sub-agent assistant message.
This would allow the UI to correctly group, filter, and display the complete sub-agent conversation independently from the supervisor conversation.
I found an issue with how sub-agent messages are persisted and represented in the UI.
When the supervisor agent assigns a task to a sub-agent, that task is saved as a user message under the supervisor agent.
The sub-agent's response is saved under the supervisor as an assistant message, with metadata containing the sub-agent ID and name.
However, the original sub-agent task/user message does not contain sub-agent metadata such as subagentId or subagentName.
Because of this, the UI cannot reliably filter or identify sub-agent assistant messages vs. sub-agent user/task messages.
Expected behavior
Both sides of the sub-agent interaction should include consistent metadata, for example:
{
"subagentId": "...",
"subagentName": "..."
}
The metadata should be attached to the sub-agent task/user message as well as the sub-agent assistant message.
This would allow the UI to correctly group, filter, and display the complete sub-agent conversation independently from the supervisor conversation.