Certain constituent-dimensioned or dust(4)-dimensioned fields are not written correctly into CAM snapshots

[jimmielin]

What happened?

Observe CAM snapshots

constituent-dimensioned fields like pbuf_FRACIS are written with a constituent dimension which is unsupported by CAM-SIMA to write and impossible to re-assemble, because CAM's constituent ordering is different from CAM-SIMA.

A previous workaround was added for cam_in_cflx to append the constituent name instead of using a constituent dimension. We need to do that too for FRACIS.

For cam_in_dstflx it has a dimension of size 4 for dust bins, but it does not get written, only passed as a 1D array (ncol) so the dimension 4 is lost

What are the steps to reproduce the bug?

Observe CAM snapshots

What CAM tag were you using?

cam6_4_185

What machine were you running CAM on?

CISL machine (e.g. derecho)

What compiler were you using?

GNU

Path to a case directory, if applicable

No response

Will you be addressing this bug yourself?

Yes

Extra info

No response