"Structured workflows that make LLMs think instead of guess" - perfect framing of the problem!
Agile V tackles this through enforced process gates:
- Clarify intent → Create requirements → Build → Verify → Accept
Your verification, exploration, and synthesis workflows align with our evidence-based approach. The key is moving from "the LLM said it's done" to "here's the evidence it meets requirements."
Integration possibilities:
Could Deep Process workflows be the "reasoning engine" that drives Agile V gates?
Example flow:
- Deep Process exploration workflow → identifies requirements and feasibility
- Agile V requirements gate → formalizes and approves requirements
- Deep Process synthesis workflow → generates implementation
- Agile V verification gate → independent Red Team validation
- Deep Process architecture reasoning → evaluates design decisions
- Agile V approval gate → human decision with full evidence
Agile V repos:
The value:
Deep Process provides the AI reasoning quality, Agile V provides the governance and traceability. Together they could create a complete "think deeply AND verify rigorously" system.
Would love to explore integration possibilities!
"Structured workflows that make LLMs think instead of guess" - perfect framing of the problem!
Agile V tackles this through enforced process gates:
Your verification, exploration, and synthesis workflows align with our evidence-based approach. The key is moving from "the LLM said it's done" to "here's the evidence it meets requirements."
Integration possibilities:
Could Deep Process workflows be the "reasoning engine" that drives Agile V gates?
Example flow:
Agile V repos:
The value:
Deep Process provides the AI reasoning quality, Agile V provides the governance and traceability. Together they could create a complete "think deeply AND verify rigorously" system.
Would love to explore integration possibilities!